I agree it won't happen without a lot of work. Here's our article assessing assumptions around wood products substituting for ones with more emissions intensity and possible options.
Wood product carbon substitution benefits: a critical review of assumptions
Good article, thanks for sharing. I agree that there are far too assumptions floating around about the bioeconomy, such as "we can use more wood and it won't affect wood prices." I have recently heard Nordic sawmillers complain of tight (and hence expensive) log supplies, due in part to competing uses, such as subsidized biofuel production.
I agree it won't happen without a lot of work. Here's our article assessing assumptions around wood products substituting for ones with more emissions intensity and possible options.
Wood product carbon substitution benefits: a critical review of assumptions
https://cbmjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13021-021-00171-w
Good article, thanks for sharing. I agree that there are far too assumptions floating around about the bioeconomy, such as "we can use more wood and it won't affect wood prices." I have recently heard Nordic sawmillers complain of tight (and hence expensive) log supplies, due in part to competing uses, such as subsidized biofuel production.